person:ed miliband

  • The pro-Israel lobby is losing its grip on Westminster – Middle East Monitor
    Yvonne Ridley | September 27, 2017

    https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20170927-the-pro-israel-lobby-is-losing-its-grip-on-westminster

    This has not been a good week for Israel, especially in Britain, where the Zionist lobbyists have spent millions in recent years oiling the cogs in Westminster to persuade politicians of all stripes to give their unconditional support to their favourite state. It has worked rather well for them, with Labour Party leaders like Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Ed Miliband joining their counterparts in the Tory Party as “Friends of Israel” along with the majority of their ministers and shadow ministers.

    However, after this week’s triumphant Labour Party conference in Brighton it looks as if the pro-Israel lobby has lost its grip on the party led by Jeremy Corbyn. If anyone had any doubt that the Zionist influence has all but gone, it was dispelled by the Labour leader’s speech.

    “And let’s give real support to end the oppression of the Palestinian people, the 50-year occupation and illegal settlement expansion and move to a genuine two-state solution of the Israel-Palestine conflict,” Corbyn roared. “Britain’s voice needs to be heard independently in the world,” he added to cheers from around the conference hall. As if to reinforce that this was not some sentence thrown in at random, Corbyn fired a warning shot to Israel’s greatest friends in Washington for good measure: “We must be a candid friend to the United States, now more than ever.”

  • Corbyn, la renaissance surprise du Labour

    http://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2017/08/11/corbyn-la-renaissance-surprise-du-labour_5171230_3214.html

    Depuis les législatives du 8 juin, le dirigeant du Parti travailliste triomphe, prêt à remplacer la première ministre, Theresa May.

    Jeremy Corbyn est prêt. Prêt à négocier le Brexit, prêt à former un gouvernement. Bref, prêt à remplacer Theresa May à Downing Street. Pour la gauche britannique, qui avait fait son deuil d’un retour au pouvoir dans un avenir prévisible, les législatives du 8 juin ont sonné comme une divine surprise et pris des airs de triomphe.

    « Dans six mois, je serai premier ministre », a confié le chef du Labour à Michael Eavis, le directeur du festival de Glastonbury, grand rendez-vous estival de la scène alternative. Le 24 juin, un discours du vieux dirigeant y a attiré plus de jeunes branchés que le groupe Radiohead, la veille. « Oh, Jer-e-my Cor-byn », scandé au rythme du tube américain Seven Nation Army des White Stripes, en est devenu l’hymne.

    Sur les colliers, les T-shirts, les posters et les sculptures de sable, « Jeremy », 68 ans, était partout. Dirigé par une Theresa May en sursis, le pays prend désormais très au sérieux la possibilité que l’ancien permanent syndical, longtemps présenté comme un loser, se voie confier les clés du « number ten », le siège du gouvernement.

    Corbynmania ?

    D’ailleurs, l’intéressé reprendra sa tournée des circonscriptions dès la mi-août, prévoyant – et souhaitant – de nouvelles élections que les travaillistes pourraient gagner, selon les sondages. Pas un média qui ne s’interroge sur la Corbynmania, pas un politologue qui ne disserte sur la renaissance surprise du Labour.

    L’obscur député de Finsbury Park (nord de Londres), élu de l’aile gauche du parti depuis trois décennies, revient de loin. Voilà tout juste un an, au lendemain de la victoire du Brexit au référendum, les trois quarts des députés de son propre parti avaient voté une motion de défiance à son encontre, l’accusant d’avoir traîné les pieds pour défendre la ligne proeuropéenne du parti. Mais les adhérents de base, qui l’avaient élu une première fois à la surprise générale en septembre 2015, l’ont conforté.

    Partisan d’un grand retour de l’Etat pour lutter contre les inégalités, anti-establishment et sceptique sur l’Europe, sympathisant du Venezuela chaviste, Jeremy Corbyn évoque aujourd’hui une sorte de Jean-Luc Mélenchon britannique. A deux différences de taille près : il a été plébiscité à la tête du Parti travailliste, et se trouve aujourd’hui en position d’accéder au pouvoir.

    Car son programme, qui tourne résolument le dos au néolibéralisme du « New Labour » de Tony Blair, a drainé un nombre spectaculaire d’électeurs. Crédité de 28 % des voix au début de la campagne des législatives, en avril, le Labour de Corbyn en a rassemblé 40 % le 8 juin. Le meilleur résultat depuis M. Blair et la plus forte remontée d’une élection à l’autre depuis… Clement Attlee en 1945.

    Un programme centré sur les principaux problèmes sociaux

    L’un des partis progressistes les plus en difficulté d’Europe est devenu en quelques semaines l’un des espoirs de la gauche. La cote de popularité de son dirigeant, catastrophique à l’été 2016 (16 % contre 52 % à Theresa May), vient de dépasser celle de la première ministre (44 % contre 34 %) qui a perdu la majorité absolue au Parlement.

    « Avec Jeremy, quelque chose de vraiment nouveau est possible, pour une fois. Il est humain, proche des gens ordinaires. Ce n’est pas seulement un homme politique, c’est l’un d’entre nous », résume Louise Emmins, 37 ans, pour qui Jeremy Corbyn symbolise un double espoir : le maintien des allocations sociales pour son mari handicapé et la fin des études supérieures payantes pour leur fils. « Il est authentique, sage, constant. Il parle aux gens, pas à la presse, et donne envie de s’engager en politique », dit Wisam Wahab, un étudiant de 17 ans rencontré lui aussi lors d’un meeting.

    Les réunions de Jeremy Corbyn mêlent toujours deux publics : de vieux électeurs du Labour qui votaient en se bouchant le nez – ou ne votaient plus du tout – pendant les années Tony Blair, Gordon Brown et Ed Miliband, et des jeunes attirés par ce qu’ils perçoivent comme un programme résolument neuf : renationalisation des chemins de fer, fin de l’austérité avec relance des services publics et construction de logements sociaux financées par une hausse de l’impôt sur les sociétés, interdiction des « contrats de travail à zéro heure » sans salaire garanti.

    « For the many not for the few » (« pour le plus grand nombre, pas pour quelques-uns ») : ce slogan est la clé de voûte d’un programme centré sur les principaux problèmes sociaux – la précarité du travail, l’inaccessibilité des logements, le coût et l’inefficacité des transports, l’engorgement des hôpitaux et des écoles.

    « Il représente le changement »

    A l’instar de Jean-Luc Mélenchon, le chef de file de La France insoumise, ou de Bernie Sanders, le rival d’Hillary Clinton lors des primaires du camp démocrate américain, le vieux militant a trouvé le ton pour séduire en même temps les jeunes et les classes éduquées sans trop s’aliéner les électeurs des milieux populaires.

    Jeremy Corbyn « a réussi à rassembler les principales forces disponibles : le radicalisme anticapitaliste des jeunes, le culte bourgeois de l’authenticité et l’expression la plus crue des intérêts individuels », analyse John Gray, chroniqueur au New Statesman, un hebdomadaire de gauche. « Il représente le changement et pour bon nombre d’électeurs, cela suffit, quelle que soit la nature du changement », rétorque avec dépit Rod Liddle dans The Spectator, publication symétrique à droite qui compare son « populisme » à celui de Donald Trump.

    Les promesses de M. Corbyn, jugées impossibles à financer et démagogiques par les conservateurs, ont fait mouche, de même que son ambiguïté à propos du Brexit. Sachant que trois députés du Labour sur quatre sont élus dans des circonscriptions ayant voté pour la sortie de l’Union européenne en dépit de la consigne du parti, Jeremy Corbyn évite le plus possible d’aborder cet – énorme – sujet qui divise ses partisans. Stratégie gagnante : peu de « leavers » (pro-Brexit) travaillistes ont voté pour les europhobes du parti UKIP, et peu des « remainers » (pro-UE) ont fait défection en faveur des libéraux démocrates (LibDem) proeuropéens.

    Pour l’heure, le chef du Labour, longtemps objet du souverain mépris de Mme May, est en position de force. Les médias, où il se montre désormais très à l’aise, ont cessé de le snober. Dans le Financial Times, il évoque ses lectures de vacances, un essai sur Shelley, poète romantique aux idées révolutionnaires, son amour pour le vélo et pour son chat.

    Sur le Brexit, l’idole des jeunes joue l’ambivalence

    Augmentation du salaire des fonctionnaires, dénonciation de la dérégulation après l’incendie de la Grenfell Tower (au moins 79 morts à Londres le 14 juin), remise en cause des droits d’inscription universitaires… L’ex-outsider dicte désormais l’agenda politique à des Tories tétanisés. Theresa May lui doit probablement d’être maintenue pour l’instant au pouvoir : son éviction pourrait déboucher sur de nouvelles élections et un échec cuisant au profit du parti de M. Corbyn.

    Mais l’ambivalence de ce dernier sur le Brexit masque de moins en moins les fractures béantes du Labour sur le sujet. Comme Theresa May, le leader de gauche défend bec et ongles le Brexit et la sortie du marché unique européen, tout en promettant de négocier avec les Vingt-Sept pour obtenir le maintien du libre accès après la sortie de l’UE. Les élus Labour qui dénoncent le caractère irréaliste et démagogique de cette position sont mis à l’écart ou tancés par ses soins. Or, 66 % des adhérents du Labour sont favorables au maintien dans le marché unique.

    « Corbyn a passé sa vie à répéter que l’Europe était une partie du problème et non de la solution. Il voit le Brexit comme une chance de mettre en œuvre son programme socialiste radical de nationalisations, de retour des aides de l’Etat et de commerce administré », observe le journaliste Larry Elliott dans The Guardian.

    Bien des jeunes, furieux contre le Brexit, se sont mobilisés pour le Labour cette année, attirés aussi par sa promesse d’un retour à la gratuité de l’enseignement supérieur. Jeremy Corbyn leur doit en partie son extraordinaire remontée électorale. Que se passera-t-il lorsque, l’épreuve de vérité des négociations de Bruxelles aidant, le quiproquo sera levé et qu’ils s’apercevront que leur idole, par idéologie, s’accommode tout à fait du Brexit ?

  • La « communauté juive » britannique appellerait à ne pas voter pour le Parti travailliste et à ne plus le soutenir financièrement suite à ses prises de position et initiatives en faveur des Palestiniens, notamment le vote au Parlement pour la reconnaissance de l’Etat de Palestine

    British Jews turn away from Ed Miliband’s Labour Party - Israel Jewish Scene, Ynetnews
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4654379,00.html

    A campaign underway in recent months among the British Jewish community is calling on its members not only to refrain from voting Labour, but also to cease making donations to the party.
     
    Miliband, who was born and raised in a Jewish home, has voiced criticism of Israel in the past; but many British Jews view the Labour leader’s pro-Palestinian stance over the past year as too extreme.
     
     
    During Operation Protective Edge in the summer of 2014, Miliband described Israel’s actions as “unjustified;” and then in October, it was his party that initiated the vote in Parliament to recognize the State of Palestine.
     
    In a survey conducted among British Jews by the London-based weekly, The Jewish Chronicle, some 69 percent of the respondents said they were voting for the Conservative Party, with just 22 percent planning to cast a ballot for Miliband.

  • Labour funding crisis: Jewish donors drop ’toxic’ Ed Miliband - UK Politics - UK - The Independent
    Sunday 09 November 2014
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-funding-crisis-jewish-donors-drop-toxic-ed-miliband-9849299.ht

    The Labour party is facing desertion by Jewish donors and supporters because of Ed Mili-band’s “toxic” anti-Israeli stance over Gaza and Palestine. In a fresh headache for the Labour leader, it is understood that Mr Miliband has been warned that Jewish backers are deserting the party in droves over what community leaders perceive to be a new, aggressive pro-Palestine policy at the expense of Israeli interests.

    One prominent Jewish financial backer, a lifelong Labour supporter, said he no longer wanted to “see Mr Miliband in Downing Street or Douglas Alexander as Foreign Secretary”.

    A senior Labour MP warned that Mr Miliband now had a “huge if not insurmountable challenge” to maintain support from parts of the Jewish community that had both backed and helped fund Tony Blair and Gordon Brown’s election campaigns.

    • Les donateurs juifs anglais en train d’abandonner Ed Miliband
      Le chef des travaillistes britanniques est désormais perçu comme beaucoup trop « pro-palestinien »
      Times of Israel Staff 9 novembre 2014, 20:04
      http://fr.timesofisrael.com/les-donateurs-juifs-anglais-en-train-dabandonner-ed-miliband

      Le chef du parti travailliste britannique Ed Miliband perd le soutien de donateurs juifs à cause de la position pro-palestinienne de son parti, a rapporté un journal britannique.

      The Independent a consacré un de ses articles de dimanche aux « donateurs juifs qui abandonnent un Miliband ‘toxique’ » et a indiqué que les bailleurs de fonds du chef de file de l’opposition britannique, qui est Juif, sont désormais dissuadés par ses positions sur la question israélo-palestinienne.

      « Miliband a été averti que ses supporters juifs désertaient le parti en masse sur ce que les dirigeants de la communauté perçoivent comme une nouvelle politique pro-palestinienne agressive au détriment des intérêts israéliens, » selon le rapport.

      Le rapport indique que des dîners de collecte de fonds ont été annulés par les partisans traditionnels qui se plaignent que Miliband ait abandonné une position « équilibrée » sur le conflit, position devenue trop favorable aux Palestiniens, sans que la question soit débattue correctement au sein de son parti.

      Un député travailliste a averti que M. Miliband avait maintenant un« énorme challenge presque insurmontable, pour maintenir le soutien de certaines parties de la communauté juive qui avaient soutenu et aidé à financer les campagnes électorales de Tony Blair et Gordon Brown », selon le rapport.(...)

    • Où l’on se rend compte qu’il serait particulièrement dramatique pour sa ligne politique que le parti britannique « de gauche » soit obligé de moins se faire financer par des donateurs individuels millionnaires et plus par des organisations syndicales… :-))

  • MH17 and Gaza: Two different elite reactions — RT Op-Edge
    http://rt.com/op-edge/174928-mh17-gaza-reactions

    It is important to understand that being anti-Russian, but also pro-Israel, and pro-US are “required” positions for anyone wanting to hold high office in the West. The Russia test, the Israel test, and the US test can be seen as “three hoops” which any ambitious politician needs to jump through in order to make it to the top. British Labour leader Ed Miliband knows this and has been hard at work.

    After Prince Charles had reportedly compared President Putin to Hitler, Miliband said the Prince “has got a point”. He has declared himself a Zionist, and at time of writing he is jumping through the last of the hoops – he is in the US meeting President Obama.

    Miliband knows that if he takes the “right” positions on Russia, Israel and the US he will be “allowed” by the establishment to become British Prime Minister next year. The system is set up to make sure that no one who doesn’t hold the “right” views on foreign policy is able to hold power regardless of what the public thinks.
    (…)
    The start of this current wave of Russophobia can be traced back to last summer, when Russia helped block US plans to bomb Syria. The Western elites wanted and still want President Assad toppled because of Syria’s alliance with Hezbollah and Iran and they were determined to pay Russia back for thwarting their plans. A “regime change” in Ukraine was the way that would be achieved.
    (…)
    The gap between the Russophobic obsessions of the elite, and the real concerns of ordinary people is however huge, and was starkly demonstrated again by last weekend’s massive anti-war marches. Media Lens, the media monitoring organization, captured this “disconnect”’ perfectly in a single tweet:


    The British Government’s response to Israel killing children, bombing a hospital and a center for the disabled, is to push the EU to impose more sanctions on… Russia. You really couldn’t make it up, could you? Two tragedies, but two very different reactions. Reactions which tell us everything.

  • Paul Flowers’ escort Ciaron Dodd reveals drug-fuelled sex in rooms paid for by the Co-op | Mail Online
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2510241/Paul-Flowers-escort-Ciaron-Dodd-reveals-drug-fuelled-sex-rooms-paid-Co-

    The rent boy and trysts in rooms paid for by the Co-op: Escort reveals Flowers sent him emails to organise drug-fuelled sex from his work account

    Ciaron Dodd said they met in plush hotel rooms paid for by struggling bank
    The £650-a-night escort revealed messages sent by Reverend Flowers
    Methodist minister used work account to arrange ’drug-fuelled threesomes’
    Mr Dodd says relationship ended when Flowers refused to pay £2,000
    Flowers allegedly met him through the escort website ‘Manchester Lads’

    By Nazia Parveen, Eleanor Harding and Sam Greenhill

    PUBLISHED: 23:15 GMT, 19 November 2013 | UPDATED: 08:20 GMT, 20 November 2013

    252 shares

    191

    View
    comments
    Ciaron Dodd said Paul Flowers was debauched and ’showered him with gifts’

    Ciaron Dodd said Paul Flowers was debauched and ’showered him with gifts’

    The humiliation of Paul Flowers worsened yesterday when a rent boy claimed the ousted Co-op chief hired him for sex.

    Ciaron Dodd, 21, said they met in plush hotel rooms paid for by the struggling bank.

    The Methodist minister, who was forced to quit his £130,000 role in June, showered him with gifts and took him for nights out to the theatre, said Mr Dodd.

    The explosive allegations came as the Labour Party faced further damaging questions about its links with Flowers.

    Pictures have emerged of a lavish reception hosted by Ed Miliband and Ed Balls at 10 Downing Street for Flowers and fellow Co-op grandees while Labour was in power.

    It also emerged that Labour knew two years ago that Flowers had been forced to resign as one of the party’s city councillors after gay porn was found on his computer.

    But it appears the Co-op was not told – allowing him to continue until June as its banking chairman, a position from which he helped to approve massive donations to Labour and Mr Balls.

    Dodd, a £650-a-night escort, has backed up his claim by producing damning messages sent by Flowers, 63, from his work email - in which he organises drug-fuelled threesomes.

    Dodd said: ‘I knew what he did for a living and couldn’t believe how debauched he was.

    ‘Every time he saw me he knew he was risking everything – but he just didn’t seem to care.

    ‘He took me to the theatre and gave me presents like chocolate and wine. I was old enough to be his grandson but he didn’t seem to think we looked like the odd couple.’

    In emails from Flowers’ work account – paul.flowers@co-operative.coop – he wrote unguardedly about sex and drugs.

    One email to the rent boy states: ‘Been waiting for you to come and have some coke (cocaine) and k (Ketamin) with me. P x.’

    More...

    Co-op Group boss dramatically quits in growing row over ex-banking chief caught buying crystal meth and cocaine
    Let’s hear it for the Crystal Methodist: Why, by tonight, Flowers will be portrayed as a hapless ’victim’ of an evil newspaper

    In another exchange, Mr Dodd asks if he can bring his friend Lucas. Flowers replies: ‘I like him a lot – but I can’t afford 2 of you this time! PXx’.

    Mr Dodd claimed the relationship ended when Flowers refused to pay £2,000 he owed.

    Another 31-year-old escort, who asked not to be named, said the bank boss often talked about his work.

    He told the Sun newspaper: ‘He said there was going to be a public announcement about how a deal with Lloyds TSB had fallen through. A few days later I heard it on the news.’

    Part-time model Mr Dodd said Flowers contacted him through the escort website ¿Manchester Lads¿ in 2011.

    Part-time model Mr Dodd said Flowers contacted him through the escort website ¿Manchester Lads¿ in 2011.

    Risking everything: Paul Flowers was forced to quit his £130,000 role in June

    Risking everything: Paul Flowers was forced to quit his £130,000 role in June

    Part-time model Mr Dodd said Flowers contacted him through the escort website ‘Manchester Lads’ in 2011.

    For their first meeting, Flowers took him to see a play, You Can’t Take It With You, at Manchester’s Royal Exchange theatre before taking him to a hotel.

    Flowers then paid £650 to hire Mr Dodd for the night and take a cocktail of drugs including amyl nitrate (poppers), cocaine, ketamine and party drug GHB, he claimed.

    The pair were soon seeing each other once a week and Flowers would regularly take his new male companion to high-class restaurants and top up his bank account with extra cash, Mr Dodd said.

    On top of his standard ‘fee’, he received almost £500 over a 28-day period and he was paid an extra £150 if he brought another rent boy along to the sex sessions.

    Mr Dodd said: ‘I would meet Paul at the Renaissance Hotel in Manchester – which was paid for by the bank – while he was in town on business.

    ‘I would also go to his house where he would hold parties with other escorts and friends. It wasn’t long after our first meeting that Paul tested the water with me in terms of drugs.

    ‘He asked me if I dabbled and before long drugs were always involved when I met with him.

    ’Paul enjoyed my company too, though. He’d like to spend hours drinking, talking and taking drugs. He would raise his glass and say, “To good health darling” before we had a drink.’

    Mr Dodd, from Manchester, said Flowers would often go to work after less than an hour of sleep.

    It has also emerged Reverend Flowers was convicted of gross indecency in a public toilet with a man believed to be a trucker in 1981.

    He admitted the offence at Fareham Magistrates’ Court in Hampshire, and was fined £75 with £35 legal costs.

    Flowers told justices he was ‘shamed and embarrassed’ about the incident but maintained he was involved ‘at the other man’s instigation’.

    Yet he was allowed to continue as a Methodist minister.

    Even then, Flowers had friends in high places. He produced a character reference from a Labour peer, Lord Soper of Kingsway, who told the court his friend had suffered a traumatic experience.

    Yesterday, Flowers stepped down from Terrence Higgins Trust’s board of trustees.

    The Tories last night urged Mr Miliband and Mr Balls to ‘come clean’ about their links with Flowers, who has been suspended from the party.

    Both men have been scrambling to distance themselves from the disgraced Methodist minister since the Mail on Sunday captured him on film buying hard drugs, including crack cocaine and crystal meth.
    Hospitality: Paul Flowers (centre) at Downing Street for the launch of a Co-op venture in 2010

    Hospitality: Paul Flowers (centre) at Downing Street for the launch of a Co-op venture in 2010

    Labour support: Ed Miliband at the same function with Co-op chairman Len Wardle (left)

    Labour support: Ed Miliband at the same function with Co-op chairman Len Wardle (left)

    But damaging details have emerged about the extraordinary position Flowers had held at the heart of Labour. At the Downing Street dinner in February 2010, he can be seen drinking wine and mingling with guests, who included a string of Labour ministers.

    Mr Miliband is pictured laughing and joking with Len Wardle, another senior Co-op figure who has quit as the group’s chairman because of ‘serious questions’ over his decision to appoint Flowers to the bank’s board.

    Mr Balls, one of 32 Labour MPs who receive financial sponsorship from the Co-op, was also pictured networking at the event, which was held to launch the ‘Friends of the Co-operative ideal’.
    BY NUMBERS.jpg

    A report of the event, in Co-operative News, reveals that Mr Miliband was ‘in demand’ from senior Co-op figures because he was in charge of Labour’s manifesto for the election that May.

    A few months later, Flowers, who describes Mr Balls as a ‘political friend’ was appointed to the Co-op’s ‘political strategy working group’.

    Along with Mr Wardle, he approved millions of pounds in donations to the Labour and Co-operative parties, including a £50,000 donation to Mr Balls.

    Despite the economic crisis – and the Co-op’s dire finances – the group has increased its political donations from £664,000 in 2008 to £880,000 last year.

    Flowers boasted to MPs earlier this month that he had helped oversee an increase in the maximum annual donations to £1.15million before stepping down.

    Following the Number 10 dinner, Mr Miliband appointed Flowers to his exclusive business advisory board.

    The Labour leader went on to hold dinners with Flowers and other business figures at Westminster restaurants in July and November of 2011.

    This March, he invited Flowers for private talks at his Commons office. The following month the Co-op Bank threw Labour a financial lifeline with a £1.2million loan.

    In a letter to the Labour leader, Conservative Party chairman Grant Shapps demanded answers to nine critical questions, including what the Labour leadership knew about Flowers’ resignation from Bradford council and what personal dealings Mr Miliband had with him while the Co-op was doling out cash to Labour.

    Mr Shapps wrote: ‘The latest revelations about the conduct and behaviour of Paul Flowers have shocked and appalled the public.

    ’They have also raised serious questions about the Labour Party to which you have not yet adequately responded.’

    Tory MP Brooks Newmark, a member of the Commons Treasury committee, which is investigating the near-collapse of the Co-op during Flowers’ time as chairman, said there were also questions about whether Labour had been involved in his extraordinary rise.

    Mr Newmark said: ‘Labour need to come clean about exactly what place Paul Flowers held in the Labour hierarchy.

    ’We know that the Reverend Flowers’ judgment was deeply flawed, no doubt not helped by whatever drugs he was taking.

    ‘But the question does arise whether, in spraying shareholders’ money around to the Labour Party, including an extraordinary gift of £50,000 to Ed Balls, was he engaged in some sort of payback for being given this £132,000 bank job for which he was manifestly ill-suited?

    ’We know there is a special relationship between Labour and the Co-op – did the Reverend Flowers receive support from Labour in getting the job?’

    Flowers was a senior Labour councillor before rising to prominence in the Co-op movement.

    The inappropriate material that cost him his council seat was found when he gave his laptop to the Bradford authority’s IT department for a routine servicing.

    Shocked council officials confronted him with the images, and he resigned immediately. But in public, he pretended he was leaving for family reasons and because of his high-pressure role at the Co-op Bank.
    Pugh

    Yesterday, a spokesman for Bradford Council said: ‘Inappropriate but not illegal adult content was found on a council computer handed in by Councillor Flowers for servicing. This was put to him and he resigned immediately.’

    Bradford Council confirmed last night that it did not inform the Co-op of the reason for Mr Flowers’s resignation because, although he had breached the council’s rules, he had not broken the law.

    At the time, the then leader of the council, Councillor Ian Greenwood, paid tribute to his work and called him ‘a highly gifted individual who has made an enormous contribution as a member of the executive’.

    Mr Miliband and Mr Balls both deny having close links with Flowers.

    Labour refused to comment in detail on the fresh allegations yesterday.

    A spokesman said: ‘Ed Miliband and the Labour leadership have been as shocked as anyone at the recent revelations regarding Paul Flowers. That is why we have taken immediate action and suspended him from the Labour Party.’

    Mr Balls was under further pressure last night to hand back a £50,000 donation from the Co-op. Mr Newmark said: ‘Mr Balls should ask himself whether it is right to accept that money and consider giving it back.’

    A spokesman for Mr Balls insisted there was no reason to return the money as it had been properly donated by the Co-op Group.

    Former Co-op bank chief caught on camera in ’crystal meth deal’
    Co-op Group boss quits in growing row over ex-banking chief caught buying drugs

    The Co-op was plunged into fresh chaos yesterday as its chairman fell on his sword for appointing crack addict Reverend Paul Flowers to head the group’s bank.

    Len Wardle’s resignation came as anger is growing among ordinary investors whose retirement incomes are being raided to prop up the disaster-prone bank.

    He admitted ‘serious questions’ were raised by the drugs scandal over former banking chairman Paul Flowers.

    Mr Flowers, a former Labour councillor and Methodist minister who was chairman of the Co-operative Bank when it ran into trouble, faces an investigation by the police after being covertly filmed counting off £20 notes to buy hard drugs.

    He was covertly filmed buying crystal meth and crack cocaine.

    More...

    Co-op Group boss dramatically quits in growing row over ex-banking chief caught buying crystal meth and cocaine
    Let’s hear it for the Crystal Methodist: Why, by tonight, Flowers will be portrayed as a hapless ’victim’ of an evil newspaper

    Resigned: Co-operative Group chairman Len Wardle has quit his job with immediate effect
    Ursula Lidbetter replaces Mr Wardle in running the troubled Co-op Group

    Resigned: Co-operative Group chairman Len Wardle, left, has quit his job with immediate effect. Ursula Lidbetter, right, replaces Mr Wardle in running the troubled Co-op Group

    The Co-operative Group yesterday launched a fact-finding investigation into ’any inappropriate behaviour’ at the group or the Co-operative Bank and a ’root-and-branch review’ of the structure of the organisation.

    There is growing incredulity that a man with no banking experience and a penchant for crystal meth and cocaine had been made chairman of a bank.

    But today Mr Wardle announced he will quit the £145,000 position he has held since 2007.

    He was due to leave next May but he said it was now right for him to go straight away, having led the board that appointed Mr Flowers.

    Mr Wardle said: ‘The recent revelations about the behaviour of Paul Flowers, the former chair of the Co-operative Bank, have raised a number of serious questions for both the bank and the group.

    ‘The recent revelations about the behaviour of Paul Flowers, the former chair of the Co-operative Bank, have raised a number of serious questions for both the bank and the group. I led the board that appointed Paul Flowers to lead the bank board, and under those circumstances I feel that it is right that I step down now, ahead of my planned retirement in May next year’

    – Len Wardle

    ‘I led the board that appointed Paul Flowers to lead the bank board and under those circumstances I feel that it is right that I step down now, ahead of my planned retirement in May next year.

    ‘I have already made it clear that I believe the time is right for real change in our operations and our governance and the board recently started a detailed review of our democracy.

    ‘I hope that the group now takes the chance to put in place a new democratic structure so we can modernise in the interests of all our members.’

    Critics have questioned how he could have been appointed given his apparent lack of experience, and Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, said that, even before the weekend’s revelations, it was clear he was ‘manifestly unsuitable’.

    The Co-operative Bank is facing a rescue plan which will see majority control turned over to investors including US hedge funds, after it was left with a £1.5 billion gap in its finances following the takeover of the Britannia Building Society in 2009.

    Mr Wardle’s departure will see him replaced by his deputy, Ursula Lidbetter, chief executive of the Lincolnshire Co-operative.

    The Co-operative Group said: ‘It is intended that Ursula will chair the group through the current governance review, which will include consideration of how the board is constituted and chaired.’
    ED BALLS UNDER PRESSURE OVER £50,000 DONATION FROM CO-OP

    Shadow chancellor Ed Balls is under pressure over a £50,000 donation from the Co-op

    Ed Balls has come under pressure to return a £50,000 donation backed by the former Co-operative Bank chairman hit by claims of hard drug use.

    Labour’s leadership has attempted to distance itself from Paul Flowers, a former councillor, after it emerged he attended a private meeting with Ed Miliband and both men were also present at two dinners in Westminster.

    Sources insisted he was ’neither influential nor important’.

    Yesterday the 63-year-old was suspended from the party for bringing it into disrepute following footage that appears to show him buying drugs days after being grilled by the Treasury Select Committee over the bank’s disastrous performance.

    A Labour source: ’It’s true that there was a private meeting with Ed in March of this year. There were two informal dinners - three meetings that we can find records of in the space of three years.

    Earlier this month Mr Flowers told the Commons Treasury committee said: ’My recollection is that we paid for a particular researcher to assist the shadow chancellor in the work that he needed to do, and that we believed to be a legitimate and proper use of resources.’

    Tory MP Brooks Newmark told the Daily Telegraph: ’The Rev Flowers’ judgment was clearly impaired if he was prepared to give Ed Balls £50,000.

    ’Mr Balls should now ask himself whether it is right to accept that money, and consider giving it back.’

    MPs have castigated financial watchdogs for rubber-stamping the appointment of Rev Paul Flowers, which they denounced as a farcical ‘box-ticking exercise’.

    Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the Commons Treasury Select Committee, said it was obvious when Flowers appeared before them earlier this month that he was ‘manifestly unsuitable’ to be a bank chairman.

    He called for the regulation of senior bankers to be tightened to include continuing and ‘intrusive’ supervision.

    ‘It’s been a complete disaster. Nothing less than saying that will do,’ he told BBC Radio 4’s World At One.

    He attacked the ‘approved persons regime’, whereby a City panel supposedly checked the competence of Rev Flowers, as ‘nothing more than a massive bureaucratic, back-covering, box-ticking exercise that satisfied regulators but did little or nothing to protect shareholders or customers of banks’.

    In fact Flowers was only checked by the regulator when he became a member of the Co-op board and was not re-interviewed at all when he was promoted to chairman in April 2010.

    Flowers quit his post in June this year as his ‘ethical’ bank was driven to the brink of collapse, threatening the retirement incomes of thousands of pensioners.

    Yesterday he was also suspended by the Labour Party amid embarrassment over a £50,000 donation to Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls.

    He faces a police inquiry into his use of hard drugs, and the Co-op announced a ‘root and branch review’ into ‘any inappropriate behaviour’ during the tenure of its former boss.

    Mr Wardle will be replaced by his deputy, Ursula Lidbetter, chief executive of the Lincolnshire Co-operative.

    She told BBC Radio 4’s The World At One: ’The stories (about Mr Flowers) are shocking but it’s not something that I can comment on today. There are investigations going on, it is in the hands of police.

    ’Len had already told the membership that he was going to stand down next May and in light of the review of governance, which Len started, he felt that making a fresh start with a new chairman would be the best way forward.

    ’We have to devise a governance for the Co-operative Group which is fit for the future, for the scale and complexity of the organisation. It’s an amalgamation of many, many organisations over its 150-year history, and we realise that it needs to change, it needs to be simpler, and that will mean changing many things.

    The one thing we do want to make sure is that members still have a voice at the heart of the Co-operative Group. There are seven million members and we think their voice should be heard loud and clear, but we are open-minded about how we achieve that.

    ’The review will look at absolutely everything - it will look at what went wrong, it will look at the opportunities and we will devise a governance structure that is fit for the future, involves our members and makes sure we are very efficient and highly effective in the future.’

  • ROYAUME-UNI • Miliband brocardé pour son refus d’intervenir en Syrie | Courrier international
    http://www.courrierinternational.com/article/2013/08/29/miliband-brocarde-pour-son-refus-d-intervenir-en-syrie

    L’heure n’est pas vraiment à l’union nationale outre-Manche. The Times révèle que le mercredi 28 août Ed Miliband, le chef du Parti travailliste, a annoncé par téléphone au Premier ministre conservateur qu’il ne soutiendrait pas le vote d’une intervention britannique en Syrie. « Les travaillistes ne soutiendront aucun vote tant que les inspecteurs de l’ONU n’auront pas terminé leurs délibérations et présenté leurs conclusions au Conseil de sécurité », explique le quotidien britannique, reprenant les mots du leader travailliste.