• A Thatcher state funeral would be bound to lead to protests The Guardian

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/04/margaret-thatcher-state-funeral-protests

    It might seem an odd time to be trying it on, but a drive to rehabilitate Margaret Thatcher is now in full flow. A couple of years back, true believers were beside themselves at the collapse of their heroine’s reputation. The Tory London mayor, Boris Johnson, complained that Thatcher’s name had become a “boo-word”, a “shorthand for selfishness and me-firstism”. Her former PR guru Maurice Saatchi fretted that “her principles of capitalism are under question”.

    #royaume-uni #thatcher

  • les pauvres du monde ne mendient pas la charité des riches, ils veulent juste plus de justice et d’équité.
    contrairement à ce que pense Bill Gates et ses potes de Davos.

    The world’s poor are not begging for charity from the rich – they’re asking for justice and fairness

    Philanthropy is the enemy of justice | Robert Newman | Comment is free | The Guardian
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/27/philanthropy-enemy-of-justice?newsfeed=true

    It’s strange that at this week’s World Economic Forum the designated voice of the world’s poor has been Bill Gates, who has pledged £478m to the Global Fund to fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria, telling Davos that the world economic crisis was no excuse for cutting aid.

    It reminds me of that dark hour when Al Gore, despite being a shareholder in Occidental Petroleum, was the voice of climate change action – because Gates does not speak with the voice of the world’s poor, of course, but with the voice of its rich. It’s a loud voice, but the model of development it proclaims is the wrong one because philanthropy is the enemy of justice.

    Am I saying that philanthropy has never done good? No, it has achieved many wonderful things. Would I rather people didn’t have polio vaccines than get them from a plutocrat? No, give them the vaccines. But beware the havoc that power without oversight and democratic control can wreak.

  • Reform in Arab Gulf regimes is unattainable – for now | Sultan Sooud Al Qassemi | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/26/reform-arab-gulf-regimes-unattainable?cat=commentisfree&type=article

    Much has been said over the past 12 months about the need for reform and democratisation by Arab Gulf governments. While it is evident that Gulf governments have an aversion to genuine democratic reform, it is far too simplistic to put the blame for political stagnation squarely on them. For behind these governments is a network of interests so powerful and intricately woven that it acts as a resistance lever even in the rare instances where serious political reform is suggested.

  • This growing culture of outrage doesn’t extend free speech – it limits it | Suzanne Moore
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/18/outrage-culture-limits-free-speech

    I found a great image the other day, online obviously. It has a cat sitting in front of a computer screen. At the top it says: “OMG I have been offended.” And at the bottom: “And on the internets of all places.” The internets is, of course, where we go to be offended and then display our moral superiority, maybe by tweeting or blogging. There is no offence that can’t be hashtagged, no Facebook group that cannot collect itself at great speed.

    If one’s default setting is now to be part of some anonymous but offended mob, somehow the hierarchy of outrage implodes into meaninglessness. Thus it can appear that a whole rump of the populace is as upset by the torture of Syrians as the pomposity of Greg Wallace on MasterChef. The dismantling of Disability Allowance is a bummer, but it is not as bad as Ricky Gervais being no longer funny.

  • Sure, you can ’work’. Just don’t expect a job at the end of it | Catherine Bennett | Comment is free | The Observer
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/15/catherine-bennett-abuse-of-interns?CMP=twt_gu

    The Labour party has yet to pass judgment, but for many hard-working people the immediate reaction to the story of Cait Reilly, the 22-year-old geology graduate compelled to sweep floors for nothing at Poundland, must have been: where can I get one? References, obviously, essential.

    Most domestic employers would not, I think, insist on geology – a Russell Group geography degree would do just as well – but let’s not be picky. It would be a pleasure to have any pleasant, highly educated, preferably strong, young girl to assist with tidying and housework, knowing this will progress her career as choreographed by the government’s “sector-based work academy”.

    Frustratingly for those of us hoping to mentor the young in this way, the free geology graduates are only being distributed at this time to larger, commercial partners such as Tesco and, of course, Poundland, where Ms Reilly was ordered to fulfil an unskilled placement – ie, one which might have been filled by a less-qualified peer, a process the Department for Work and Pensions has defended as preferable to “leaving people at home doing nothing”.

    Now that Ms Reilly is hoping to bring her case for “forced labour” to court, there may be an opportunity for the department to justify its moral spin on supporting the indigent, one reminiscent of the bracing, Salvation Army approach Orwell described in Down and Out in Paris and London. It was the hostel officers’ habit, he reported, to enforce an early night, then rouse the tramps, pointlessly, at seven, “shaking those who did not get up at once”. In some shelters, the guests were required to attend a religious service.

  • Now is not the time to turn our backs on Enlightenment values | Will Hutton
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/08/will-hutton-lost-enlightenment-values

    The dynamic element on the political right across the west is giving up on the Enlightenment. No longer does it want to embrace tolerance, reason, democratic argument, progress and the drive for social betterment as cornerstones of society. Tolerance is dismissed as an indulgence and a lack of moral standards; progress is trashed as an opportunity for social engineering and a cloak to enhance state power and also as featherbedding the feckless, undeserving poor.

    La notion « no longer » dans ce genre de commentaire repose sur quoi ? Quand j’étais ado, on (nous les ceusses qui avaient fait leur éducation politique avec Pierre Arditi, Emmanuelle Béart et Daniel Balavoine), on était déjà intimement persuadés que Pasqua constituait une rupture fascisante dans l’évolution de la droite.