organization:ukrainian parliament

  • Militaristic and anti-democratic, Ukraine’s far-right bides its time - CSMonitor.com
    https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2019/0415/Militaristic-and-anti-democratic-Ukraine-s-far-right-bides-its-time

    Though few in number overall, far-right groups operate with a high degree of impunity in Ukrainian society, allowing them to harass and attack minorities and human rights advocates without repercussions.

    [..,]

    Many Ukrainian analysts argue that these new rightist groups are not “nationalist,” but rather racist, intolerant, and extreme social conservatives. But it may be a problem that more mainstream Ukrainian nationalists, such as the #Svoboda party – which does not participate in street violence – tend to make heroes of 20th-century “fighters for Ukrainian independence.” Those include Stepan #Bandera, whose fascist ideology, collaboration with the #Nazis, and participation in wartime ethnic cleansing against Poles and Jews makes him and those like him poor role models for modern Europe-bound Ukraine.

    The Ukrainian parliament has passed legislation making it illegal to deny the hero status of Mr. Bandera. In Kiev, a major boulevard was recently renamed “Bandera Prospekt.” It should be no surprise that groups like the Right Sector model themselves on such World War II-era Ukrainian nationalist fighters.

    #extrême_droite #ukraine #air_du_temps

  • Ukraine ’chooses homophobia over EU integration’
    http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/ukraine-chooses-homophobia-over-eu-integration-401535.html

    Even after the European Union reminded Ukraine that a visa-free regime would depend on the adoption of certain human rights bills, Ukraine’s parliament on Nov. 5 failed to pass a landmark bill on discrimination – a move that activists say may scare Europe off for years to come.
    […]
    The anti-discrimination bill submitted to parliament was prescribed in the EU-Ukraine Action Plan on visa liberalization. Not only did the legislation lay out protections for homosexuals; it also prohibited discrimination on the basis of skin color and religious belief.

    But with a suspiciously large number of lawmakers absent during the vote and many abstentions, the bill failed to pass, with a mere 117 votes out of the required 226.

    Political consultant Taras Beresovets said that even liberal lawmakers voted against, fearing that homophobic sentiment among voters might hurt their support.

    Some lawmakers cited “Christian” or “conservative” values for their reluctance to vote for the anti-discrimination amendment to the Labor Code. Some argued that approval of the bill would lead to the legalization of gay marriage – a claim that drew indignation from gay rights and human rights activists.

  • Un mort et de nombreux policiers blessés devant le Parlement ukrainien
    http://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2015/08/31/forte-explosion-devant-le-parlement-ukrainien-apres-le-vote-d-une-reforme-co

    Au moins quatre-vingt-dix policiers ont été blessés par une explosion devant le Parlement ukrainien, à Kiev, lundi 31 août. Arsen Avakov, le ministre de l’intérieur de l’Ukraine, a annoncé qu’un des policiers était mort, après avoir reçu un fragment d’un engin explosif dans le cœur. La déflagration a eu lieu alors que des affrontements avaient lieu entre la police et des manifestants, qui protestaient contre l’adoption en première lecture par les députés d’un projet de loi controversé donnant davantage d’autonomie aux territoires de l’Est prorusse.

  • Ukraine Open Access Initiative Roils Local Authors Seeking #Copyright Protection

    It may be an open access initiative, but Ukrainian writers and authors are on the verge of massive protests, due to a recent initiative of the Ukrainian Parliament (Verkhovna Rada) to conduct digitalisation and online publishing of all of the books and documents stored in the national archives and libraries.

    http://www.ip-watch.org/2015/07/28/ukraine-open-access-initiative-roils-local-authors-seeking-copyright-prote

    #open_source #Ukraine #digitalisation

  • With Russia Boxed In, Frozen Transdniester Conflict Could Heat Up
    http://www.rferl.org/content/with-russia-boxed-in-frozen-transdniester-conflict-could-heat-up/27044816.html

    The Ukrainian parliament’s vote this month to break off most forms of military and intelligence cooperation with Moscow over the conflict with Russian-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine threatens to upset an uneasy peace in Moldova’s breakaway Transdniester region.
     
    The Verkhovna Rada voted on May 21 to scrap a series of bilateral agreements on military cooperation with Russia, including a key provision that allows Moscow to send forces by land across Ukraine to the breakaway region.
    […]
    The move effectively cuts off Russian access to the around 1,500 soldiers it maintains in Transdniester, a sliver of land that borders Ukraine — but not Russia. The Russian deployment there is divided into an internationally mandated peacekeeping force of around 380 troops, with the rest being regular soldiers as part of its 14th Guards Army.
    […]
    Hill [former head of the OSCE Mission to Moldova and now ascholar at the Wilson Center, a nonpartisan research group based in the United States] says it’s difficult at this stage to predict the consequences, but that all sides would likely go to great lengths to avoid a resumption of hostilities.

    “My observation is that nobody there, on either the Moldovan side or the Transdniester side, really wants to start fighting again,” he says. “Both sides fear provocations — the creation of incidents that might create pressure on the other side.”

    Ce qui va donc nettement compliquer les liaisons entre la Russie et ses troupes en Transnistrie.

    Quant aux effets sur l’économie de la Transnistrie… qui doit ne pas être loin du record du monde de la contrebande. J’imagine que les tarifs vont s’en ressentir.

    Whatever happens, one casualty of the Ukrainian decision is likely to be Transdniester’s struggling economy — both the legitimate trade in steel, manufactured goods, and textiles, and the thriving illicit trade in contraband cigarettes, booze, and — recently — frozen chicken parts.

    Any impact on the black market, however, would depend on the willingness of officials in Ukraine, Moldova, and Romania to enforce their own customs laws.

  • Russia Detains Ukrainian Parliament Member Over Odessa Fire - NYTimes.com
    http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/03/01/world/europe/ap-eu-russia-ukraine.html

    Moscow police have detained a member of Ukraine’s parliament as he was taking part in a march mourning a slain Russian opposition figure. Ukraine’s parliament has protested the detention.

    The federal Investigative Committee said Alexei Goncharenko was being questioned Sunday about his alleged involvement in a fire that broke out last year in his home city Odessa between pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian demonstrators. Dozens died in the fire, including some Russian citizens.

    The speaker of Ukraine’s parliament, Volodymyr Groisman, said the detention was a violation of international law because Goncharenko has diplomatic immunity. The speaker urged Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin to take urgent measures to have the parliament member released.

    For many Russians, the Odessa fire remains one of the more painful episodes of the Ukraine conflict.

    Sur le Kyiv Post le lien vers cette brève du NYT (citée ici intégralement) est illustré ainsi


    Alexei Goncharenko, deputy of Ukrainian parliament, wearing t-shirt depicting Boris Nemtsov reading in UkrainianHeroes never die ", a hommage to a popular slogan used during last year’s pro-Western uprising in Ukraine, is pictured in Moscow on March 1, 2015 prior the march to honour opposition leader Boris Nemtsov. Moscow police detained Alexei Goncharenko ahead of the march over his alleged involvement in deadly riots in the southern Ukraine city of Odessa last year. “Police have detained me,” Alexei Goncharenko wrote on Facebook. “I did not shout anything, did not carry any banners or flags — they simply detained me over the T-shirt.”
    AFP PHOTO/ ALEXEY KRAVTSOV

  • Ukrainian parliament prepares to change electoral system
    http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/ukrainian-parliament-prepares-to-change-electoral-system-378292.html

    Discussion on Ukraine’s election law heats up as the mixed system that allows to elect half of the parliament through party lists and another half through single-mandate constituencies has proven to be a ground for corruption, experts say.

    Opora, a civil network, reports 1,114 facts of vote-buying in 44 single-mandate districts during the 2014 parliamentary campaign. Experts name fictitious charity funds as a major source of bribing the voters with money and food.

    According to the coalition agreement, signed by the leaders of five parliamentary factions on Now. 21, 2014, current mixed electoral system should be reformed by July.

    However, the parliament has not passed any alterations yet.
    (…)
    Three contradictive bills on electoral reform have been waiting to be passed by the Verkhovna Rada for two months. However, they are being criticized too.

    • Opposition Bloc’s version implies a proportional system with voting for party lists with no primaries and sets a 1 percent entry barrier, allowing marginal parties, sometimes launched ad hoc for the campaign, into the parliament.

    • Bill submitted by Batkivshchyna implies party lists that they call open, but still how the primaries should be held is not clear.

    • Petro Poroshenko’s Bloc version describes open party lists that will be formed based on the polls, which will block minor marginal parties, that sometimes do nothing else but trade their votes, from taking seats in the Rada. Moreover, the bill regulates political advertisements and reduces the chances to use the state budget for self-promotion.

    Venice Commission, Council of Europe’s group of experts on the constitutional law, supports Poroshenko’s version of the reform that makes it the most likely candidate for further adoption.
    (…)
    Finally, the experts warn that such an electoral system provokes hard competition inside the parties, which may lead to a rat race and destabilize the parliament. “We need this electoral system, but it is big responsibility for the voters and members of parliament as well,” said Oleksandr Chernenko, member of the Rada’s committee on legal policy and justice.

    Mmmoui,… la proportionnelle intégrale comme remède aux magouilles et à la corruption ?
    En effet, ça devient impossible d’acheter directement les voix des électeurs, il faudra passer par la constitution (transparente, évidemment) de liste par les partis.
    Avec recours aux #sondages pour aider à la fabrication des listes, ça va être grandiose !

  • The New #Ukraine Is Run by Rogues, Sexpots, Warlords, Lunatics and Oligarchs
    http://observer.com/2015/01/the-new-ukraine-is-run-by-rogues-sexpots-warlords-lunatics-and-oligarchs

    As exhilarating winds of change swept through the Ukrainian government, Western newspapers giddily reported the fact that after the last elections for the first time in decades there would be no Communists in the Ukrainian Parliament. But that means all possible organized opposition to the current president and prime minister is gone.

    Instead, the new Rada has a big group of parliamentarians of very uncertain political loyalties and even dubious mental state—former warlords and street activists who distinguished themselves during street fights and tire burnings.

    These government rookies are sometimes turning to strange ways of self-promotion, now within the walls of the Parliament.

    One new face in the Rada—leader of the Right Sector ultra-nationalist party and former warlord Dmytro Yarosh—admitted in a January interview with Ukrainian TV that he caresses a real hand grenade in his pocket while inside the Rada. Because he is MP, the security personnel has no right to check his pockets. They just ask if he has anything dangerous on his person and he says no. The reason to have a hand grenade on his body is that there are too many enemies of Ukraine within the MP crowding him during the voting process. He is not afraid, of course. But when the time comes, he will use this grenade and with a bit of luck he will take a lot of them with him if he dies.

  • Ukrainian parliament gives initial approval to new government
    http://www.trust.org/item/20141202164344-z05qd

    Ukraine’s parliament approved in an initial round of voting on Tuesday a new government that includes foreign technocrats in key financial roles.

    The government received 229 votes, three more than the minimum of 226 required for approval.

    But, in an unexpected development, parliamentary Speaker Volodymyr Groysman said a second round of voting would be held later on Tuesday following a debate in the 450-seat assembly.

    Le feuilleton continue.

    D’après WP[en] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verkhovna_Rada la coalition de 5 partis dispose de 303 voix.
    Porochenko : 147
    Iatseniouk : 83
    Samopomitch ; 32
    Parti Radical : 22
    Timochenko : 19

    Les deux partis de gouvernement n’ont donc récolté aucune voix de leurs trois alliés et aucune des 39 non inscrits. C’est donc : ni participation, ni soutien,…

    Avec 3 voix de majorité, c’est parti pour les grandes réformes !

    Note : la majorité est de 226 voix (450/2 + 1) malgré les 27 sièges vacants des régions de l’est et donc un nombre effectif de députés de 423.

  • President Putin’s Fiction : 10 False Claims About Ukraine
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/03/222988.htm

    As Russia spins a false narrative to justify its illegal actions in Ukraine, the world has not seen such startling Russian fiction since Dostoyevsky wrote, “The formula ‘two times two equals five’ is not without its attractions.”

    Below are 10 of President Vladimir Putin’s recent claims justifying Russian aggression in the Ukraine, followed by the facts that his assertions ignore or distort.

    Pas forcément étonnant que nos médias ne traduisent pas la liste... C’est du niveau de la cour d’école.

    • 1. Mr. Putin says: Russian forces in Crimea are only acting to protect Russian military assets. It is “citizens’ defense groups,” not Russian forces, who have seized infrastructure and military facilities in Crimea.

      The Facts: Strong evidence suggests that members of Russian security services are at the heart of the highly organized anti-Ukraine forces in Crimea. While these units wear uniforms without insignia, they drive vehicles with Russian military license plates and freely identify themselves as Russian security forces when asked by the international media and the Ukrainian military. Moreover, these individuals are armed with weapons not generally available to civilians.

      2. Mr. Putin says: Russia’s actions fall within the scope of the 1997 Friendship Treaty between Ukraine and the Russian Federation.

      The Facts: The 1997 agreement requires Russia to respect Ukraine’s territorial integrity. Russia’s military actions in Ukraine, which have given them operational control of Crimea, are in clear violation of Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty.

      3. Mr. Putin says: The opposition failed to implement the February 21 agreement with former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych.

      The Facts: The February 21 agreement laid out a plan in which the Rada, or Parliament, would pass a bill to return Ukraine to its 2004 Constitution, thus returning the country to a constitutional system centered around its parliament. Under the terms of the agreement, Yanukovych was to sign the enacting legislation within 24 hours and bring the crisis to a peaceful conclusion. Yanukovych refused to keep his end of the bargain. Instead, he packed up his home and fled, leaving behind evidence of wide-scale corruption.

      4. Mr. Putin says: Ukraine’s government is illegitimate. Yanukovych is still the legitimate leader of Ukraine.

      The Facts: On March 4, President Putin himself acknowledged the reality that Yanukovych “has no political future.” After Yanukovych fled Ukraine, even his own Party of Regions turned against him, voting to confirm his withdrawal from office and to support the new government. Ukraine’s new government was approved by the democratically elected Ukrainian Parliament, with 371 votes – more than an 82% majority. The interim government of Ukraine is a government of the people, which will shepherd the country toward democratic elections on May 25th – elections that will allow all Ukrainians to have a voice in the future of their country.

      5. Mr. Putin says: There is a humanitarian crisis and hundreds of thousands are fleeing Ukraine to Russia and seeking asylum.

      The Facts: To date, there is absolutely no evidence of a humanitarian crisis. Nor is there evidence of a flood of asylum-seekers fleeing Ukraine for Russia. International organizations on the ground have investigated by talking with Ukrainian border guards, who also refuted these claims. Independent journalists observing the border have also reported no such flood of refugees.

      6. Mr. Putin says: Ethnic Russians are under threat.

      The Facts: Outside of Russian press and Russian state television, there are no credible reports of any ethnic Russians being under threat. The new Ukrainian government placed a priority on peace and reconciliation from the outset. President Oleksandr Turchynov refused to sign legislation limiting the use of the Russian language at regional level. Ethnic Russians and Russian speakers have filed petitions attesting that their communities have not experienced threats. Furthermore, since the new government was established, calm has returned to Kyiv. There has been no surge in crime, no looting, and no retribution against political opponents.

      7. Mr. Putin says: Russian bases are under threat.

      The Facts: Russian military facilities were and remain secure, and the new Ukrainian government has pledged to abide by all existing international agreements, including those covering Russian bases. It is Ukrainian bases in Crimea that are under threat from Russian military action.

      8. Mr. Putin says: There have been mass attacks on churches and synagogues in southern and eastern Ukraine.

      The Facts: Religious leaders in the country and international religious freedom advocates active in Ukraine have said there have been no incidents of attacks on churches. All of Ukraine’s church leaders, including representatives of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Moscow Patriarchate, have expressed support for the new political leadership, calling for national unity and a period of healing. Jewish groups in southern and eastern Ukraine report that they have not seen an increase in anti-Semitic incidents.

      9. Mr. Putin says: Kyiv is trying to destabilize Crimea.

      The Facts: Ukraine’s interim government has acted with restraint and sought dialogue. Russian troops, on the other hand, have moved beyond their bases to seize political objectives and infrastructure in Crimea. The government in Kyiv immediately sent the former Chief of Defense to defuse the situation. Petro Poroshenko, the latest government emissary to pursue dialogue in Crimea, was prevented from entering the Crimean Rada.

      10. Mr. Putin says: The Rada is under the influence of extremists or terrorists.

      The Facts: The Rada is the most representative institution in Ukraine. Recent legislation has passed with large majorities, including from representatives of eastern Ukraine. Far-right wing ultranationalist groups, some of which were involved in open clashes with security forces during the EuroMaidan protests, are not represented in the Rada. There is no indication that the Ukrainian government would pursue discriminatory policies; on the contrary, they have publicly stated exactly the opposite.

    • Russian FM slams US report on Putin’s remarks on Ukraine as ‘double standards’
      http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/722469

      “We will not relegate ourselves to polemics with petty propaganda. We will only say that once again we have to deal with unacceptable arrogance and claims of ultimate truth. The U.S. has no and cannot have moral right to lecture others on how to comply with international rules and respect the sovereignty of other countries. What about the bombings of former Yugoslavia and the invasion of Iraq on falsified pretexts?” the statement said.

      “If we turn to more distant historical events, we can find many examples of American military interventions far away from the national borders in the absence of real threat to the security of the United States. The war in Vietnam claimed the lives of two million peaceful citizens, let alone the completely devastated country and the contaminated environment. Under the pretext of protecting their citizens, who had simply happened to be in conflict zones, the U.S. invaded Lebanon in 1958 and the Dominican Republic in 1965, attacked tiny Grenada in 1983, bombed Libya in 1986, and three years later occupied Panama. Nevertheless, they dare accuse Russia of ‘armed aggression’, when it steps in to defend its compatriots who make up the majority of Crimea’s population in order to prevent ultranationalist forces from organizing yet another Maidan bloodbath,” the ministry said.

    • From Washington to Moscow, everyone is lying about what’s happening in Ukraine
      http://www.haaretz.com/mobile/.premium-1.578397?v=46E241E032D2DB4C06BC1E868F8C9CB3

      Putin’s statement about the crisis was full of distortions and manipulations. But in an unusual paper meant to expose them, the U.S. State Department offered its own share of inaccuracies and half-truths.

      In Paragraph 3 the Americans seem to be choosing a very specific interpretation of the situation as it developed in Kiev late last month. “Mr. Putin says: ‘The opposition did not implement the February 21 agreement with former President Viktor Yanukovych.’ The facts: ‘The agreement presents a plan according to which the parliament must reinstate the 2004 constitution, as well as returning the country to a system that strengthens the legislative branch. Yanukovych was supposed to sign the legislation within 24 hours and to bring the crisis to an end peacefully. He refused to meet his commitment, and instead packed up the contents of his home and fled, and left behind evidence of extensive corruption,’” said the document.

      In effect, there was chaos in the Ukrainian capital, and a substantial percentage of the anti-Russian opposition demonstrators rejected the agreement formulated by the warring parties with the mediation of the European Union. The developments from the moment of the signing until Yanukovych’s flight and his ouster from parliament is not entirely clear, nor is it clear why mention of his ostensible corruption is relevant to the question of the legitimacy of removing him by force.

      In addition, the protest leaders still recognized him as president on February 25, and only said that he “is not actively leading the country as of now.”

      In Paragraph 4 the Americans deal with the legitimacy of the new government, and with Putin’s claim that Yanukovych is still Ukraine’s legitimate leader. The document of the State Department in Washington notes that on March 4 Putin himself said that the ousted president “has no political future,” and that his party, the Party of Regions, voted in favor of removing him and installing the new government, and that the parliament in Kiev confirmed the swearing in of the government by a huge majority of 82 percent.

      But the Obama administration ignored Paragraph 111 in the Ukrainian constitution, which states that parliament can oust the president only if he committed a crime. The initiation of an impeachment process must be approved by two-thirds of the legislators, with 75 percent of MPs voting in favor of the ousting itself. Those votes were not held, and therefore ratification of the new government, even with 82 percent support, was passed in contradiction of the constitution.

      In Paragraph 8 the State Department wrote: “Mr. Putin says: ‘There were mass attacks against churches and synagogues in southern and eastern Ukraine.’ The facts: ‘The religious leaders in the country and activists who favor freedom of religion said that there were no attacks against churches. All the leaders of the Church in Ukraine support the new political leadership and called for national unity. Jewish organizations in southern and eastern Ukraine reported that there was no increase in anti-Semitic incidents.”

      We found no evidence of attacks against churches in Ukraine, but in Haaretz we have already reported on a fear in the Jewish communities of an increase in anti-Semitism, as well as several incidents in which extreme right-wing gangs intensified their activity against synagogues and Jewish institutions. Our correspondent in Crimea, Anshel Pfeffer, reported that Jews were beaten in Kiev and a synagogue was destroyed there, and similar incidents occurred in the city of Zaporozhye in southeast Ukraine and in the Crimean capital of Simferopol.

      Despite that, many pointed to the fact that Russia is trying to defame the new government in Kiev by portraying it as extremely rightist, anti-Semitic and Nazi in its entirety, and some people even wondered whether those incidents weren’t Russian provocations, in order to arouse opposition to the new government. Whatever the case, it can’t really be said that there were no anti-Semitic incidents at all in southeast Ukraine.

      In the last paragraph, Paragraph 10, the United States claimed that Putin is lying about the fact that the Ukrainian parliament is influenced by extremists and terrorists. The Americans claim that the Rada (parliament) is the institution most representative of the Ukrainian public, and that extreme-right organizations that were involved in the clashes in Independence Square are not represented in it.

      But the actual situation differs significantly from the picture Washington is trying to paint. It’s true that legislators from the pro-Russian parties voted in favor of the new government, but we cannot ignore the fact that many of their members fled from Kiev, so that it is hard to claim that the parliament provides optimal representation for the pro-Russian east. In addition, the far-right party Svoboda (Liberty) received 38 seats in the legislature in the most recent elections, and its members espouse extreme anti-Semitic and nationalist views.

      In addition, the party received five portfolios in the new government, including justice minister and deputy prime minister. “The Right Sector, a small organization, armed and more extreme, which espouses a pro-Nazi ideology and is opposed to joining the EU, is not represented in parliament, but its leader Demytro Yarosh declared recently that his organization and Svoboda share many views and values," the paper stated. Incidentally, Yarosh was appointed in late February as the deputy head of the National Council for Defense and Security.

      In Paragraph 6 the Americans tried to contradict the words of the Russian president to the effect that ethnic Russians in Ukraine live in fear of the new government in Kiev, and stated that there are no reliable reports on that. They also presented the fact that the interim president of Ukraine, Oleksandr Turchynov, refused to approve a law limiting the use of the Russian language in the country, but forgot to mention that prior to that parliament had approved the law.

    • From Washington to Moscow and Kiev, everyone is lying about what’s happening in Ukraine

      Je trouve le mot « mensonge » exagéré pour la matière qui nous intéresse, ie la géopolitique. Les points de vue diffèrent, certes. Mais parler de mensonge fait plus penser à une volonté de clore tout débat, à la façon dont on évoque le point Godwin à tous propos.

      Et... les occidentaux sont, amtha, particulièrement minables dans l’affaire. Car la narrative du peuple victorieux a sérieusement du plomb dans l’aile, avec toute la documentation sur les nouveaux membres du gouvernement Ukrainien, sur les partis qui les soutiennent, et sur les mensonges au sujet des massacres lors de ce qu’il est difficile de ne pas nommer coup d’état. Et donc, je trouve les occidentaux très silencieux sur ce sujet. Limites merdeux. Ce nouveau précédent dans le « 2 poids 2 mesures » sera-t-il celui qui mettra un terme à la relative impunité de l’occident ces 20 dernières années (et plus) ?

      De plus en plus se dessine un monde « à la XIXème siècle », où les élites du monde entier font et défont les alliances, se font la guerre ici ou là, pour un bout de terre gorgé de ressources, et en entraînant les peuples derrière eux.

      Les Nations unies ne sont jamais plus efficaces que lorsque règne la crainte du nucléaire. C’est malheureux. Et j’ai cru lire que les américains envoyaient leurs bateaux vers la Crimée. Pour y faire quoi à part faire augmenter la pression ?

    • Pour les navires, ils n’étaient sans doute pas loin, puisque les É.-U. avaient envoyé deux unités pour « assister » les Russes dans la protection des JO…

      Et pas n’importe quoi,
      • le USS Taylor, frégate lance-missile (qui s’y est d’ailleurs échouée, le 12/02, en entrant dans le port turc de Samsun (l’ancienne Amisos)
      • et surtout le USS Mount Whitney, « navire de commandement », mais surtout navire espion, comme on peut le constater en comptant ses oreilles…

      Il est d’ailleurs un habitué de ces eaux, puisqu’il était déjà là pour les événements de Géorgie en 2008…

  • Europe may punish Ukraine for gay censorship law
    European Union may put new visa rules on hold to punish Ukraine if it presses ahead with ‘homosexual propaganda’ law plan
    03 October 2012 | By Tris Reid-Smith
    Ukraine’s parliament has voted for a law banning homosexual ’propaganda’.
    Photo by Jurij Skoblenko.

    Foreign ministers could punish Ukraine for voting for a new law to ban ‘homosexual propaganda’ by not allowing it visa-free access to Europe.

    GSN broke the news that the Ukrainian Parliament had pushed forward the bill, number 8711, with a landslide vote yesterday.

    If it is passed, the new law would give up to five years jail to people importing, producing or spreading positive messages about lesbians, gays and bisexuals.

    The laws authors even claim gays are a risk to Ukrainian national security.

    They said: ‘The spread of homosexuality constitutes a threat to national security as it leads to an HIV AIDS epidemic and also destroys the institute of family and can trigger a demographic crisis.’

    International bodies including Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have condemned the law.

    But perhaps the most significant threat comes from Netherlands Foreign Affairs minister Uri Rosenthal.

    Speaking in the Dutch parliament, he has already said that if the law passes the European Union (EU) should suspend plans to allow Ukrainians visa-free access to Europe.

    His threat is significant because all European foreign ministers have to agree to visa changes. So just his one vote could push the visa liberalization off the agenda.

    Ukraine’s relations with the European Union are already under strain after the EU shelved a landmark association agreement with Kyiv due to a seven-year prison sentence handed down to opposition leader Yulia Tymoshenko.

    The EU has rarely pushed LGBT rights so vigorously in the past but its diplomacy with Ukraine, which wants to join the EU, has the potential to be significant.

    The European Parliament has already said the proposals breach free speech obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

    Meanwhile Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have been quick to condemn yesterday’s anti-gay vote in the Ukrainian Parliament, the Verkhovna Rada.

    Ulrike Lunacek MEP, co-president of the LGBT Intergroup in the European Parliament, said: ‘Ukraine has set itself on a collision course with the rest of Europe. This law is not only backward-looking; it is purely anti-democratic, informed by nothing else than prejudice, and fully disrespects Ukraine’s legal obligations.

    ‘I expected more from my Ukrainian colleagues, but in pre-election times, it is easy to score cheap points by witch-hunting the LGBT community. This is the 21st century, and diversity exists in all our societies.’

    Sophie in ’t Veld MEP, vice-president of the LGBT Intergroup, added: ‘Rather than moving closer to Europe, Ukraine is taking a giant step away from Europe and its values. No country that restricts free speech and violates the rights of its LGBT citizens can expect to remain quietly in the family of European nations.

    ‘I am furious that Ukraine decides to blithely attack a vulnerable minority by denying them the right to free speech, and I expect the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly and Committee of Ministers to be strict and impartial in condemning this move.’

    The International Lesbian and Gay Association in Europe (ILGA-Europe) has said the law is so poorly defined it would be open to challenge.

    Others have even suggested that Ukraine’s proposals would criminalize children who deliver newspapers if they contained positive articles about gay people.

    ‘If voted into law, it would lead to the further marginalization of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans community in the country and would limit the work of human rights defenders,” Evelyne Paradis, Executive Director of ILGA-Europe said.

    And the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) has also condemned the proposed law.

    ‘Restrictions on rights may not be discriminatory, and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is clearly prohibited under international law,’ said Alli Jernow, senior legal adviser at the ICJ.

    ILGA-Europe has also called for European institutions to take action.

    They say if the bill goes further the EU should halt negotiations with Ukraine. And they want the Council of Europe to unequivocally denounce it to the Ukrainian government.

    The bill is now due to go before a second vote, which is scheduled for 16 October but may be delayed.

    After that the Chair of the Parliament and President Viktor Yanukovich would need to sign the bill before it would become law.

    However, the country goes to the polls on 28 October to elect the new Verkhovna Rada parliament and with 78% of Ukrainians viewing homosexuality negatively, according to a 2011 poll, some say the bill could play well domestically.