position:national security advisor

  • The steal of the century: stolen land, stolen water, stolen images – Middle East Monitor
    https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20190627-the-steal-of-the-century-stolen-land-stolen-water-stolen

    Jared Kushner and Benjamin Netanyahu must have considered it the longest of long shots but what if the Palestinians by some wild stretch of the imagination had called their bluff on the “deal of the century”; what if they had suddenly decided to turn up in Bahrain for the “Peace to Prosperity” workshop this week?

    To guard against any such thing happening, Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, wrote a deliberately offensive and insulting opinion piece on 24 June that the #New_York_Times was happy to publish. “What’s wrong with Palestinian surrender?” mused Ambassador Danon. “Surrender is the recognition that in a contest, staying the course will prove costlier than submission.” Having backed the Palestinians into a corner from which they could only say no, Kushner then had Danon stick the knife in.

    The message, in all its arrogance, was clear: if you don’t take what is on offer, it is going to get a hell of a lot worse. However, we know we have made it impossible for you to take what is on offer, so guess what? The two state solution is well and truly dead; the path to a greater Israel is secured; welcome to the new reality of Palestinian Bantustans in the West Bank and Gaza. And, oh yes, we promise to throw cash at you, $50 billion; that’s a lot of dosh, if you do what is commanded of you. If you don’t, well that money is off the table.

    While many commentators have rightly attacked the New York Times for publishing an openly racist and hate-mongering piece, they may have missed the larger significance of what is happening at speed in the killing of the two-state solution. The day before the Danon article, US National Security Advisor John Bolton accompanied the Israeli Prime Minister to land overlooking the Jordan Valley, the most fertile region of the West Bank. Nearly 90 per cent of the valley has been allocated to Israeli settlements and agriculture, in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 242 and international law.

    #vol #voleurs #sans_vergogne #Palestine #impunité #etats-unis #sionisme

  • Security Brief: Unclear U.S. Demands on North Korea; Iran Deal Fall Out – Foreign Policy
    http://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/14/security-brief-unclear-u-s-demands-on-north-korea-iran-deal-fall-out

    Don’t shoot the messenger. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un are set to meet on June 12 in Singapore for a highly anticipated summit meeting, but White House officials are struggling to get on the same page in their messaging ahead of the summit.

    Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Advisor John Bolton made the rounds on Sunday talk shows to pledge that the United States does not seek to overthrow Kim and that the United States will help boost the North Korean economy if he agrees to give up his nuclear weapons.

    What President Trump wants is to see the North Korean regime get rid of its nuclear weapons program in completely and in totality and in exchange for that, we are prepared to ensure that the North Korean people get the opportunity that they so richly deserve,” Pompeo said on CBS.

    But at another point in his CBS interview, Pompeo appeared to outline a far more modest goal for the summit — that “America is no longer held at risk” by North Korean nuclear weapons and that Pyongyang eliminate its chemical and biological weapons program.

    In an appearance on Fox News, Pompeo again appeared to focus on preventing North Korean nukes reaching American targets, “America’s interest here is preventing the risk that North Korea will launch a nuclear weapon into L.A. or Denver or to the very place we are sitting here this morning,” Pompeo said. “That’s our objective.

    Pompeo’s rhetorical stumbles over the weekend are notable in part because of an astounding admission he made on Friday. Asked how he would define what the United States means by its goal of “denuclearization” in North Korea, Pompeo conceded: “I’m not sure how to define it fully.

    He then immediately back-tracked and offered a convoluted answer: “It’s pretty clear what that means. It would be an activity that undertook to ensure that we didn’t end up in the same place that we’d ended up before, or multiple passes at trying to solve this conundrum for the world, how to ensure that North Korea doesn’t possess the capacity to threaten not only the United States but the world with nuclear weapons.

    • Je ne sais pas ce qui, de tout ça, est le plus inquiétant…

      …to ensure that the North Korean people get the opportunity that they so richly deserve.

      (comment ne pas entendre : _se débarrasser, ENFIN !, de la famille Kim ?)

      America is no longer held at risk

      Sympa pour les alliés sud-coréens et japonais.

      I’m not sure how to define fully “denuclearization” in North Korea.

      sans commentaire…

  • ††† Mỹ Lai : 16. März 1968 - DaybyDay ISSN 1860-2967
    http://daybyday.press/article6193.html

    C’était au Vietnam il y a cinquante ans. Rien n’a changé sauf l’endroit précis du massacre. Les impérialistes sont toujours les mêmes. Ils ont de nouveaux camarades dans leur chambre de la maison d’aliénés qu’est ce monde. Les peuples continuent à se battre. Ils n’ont pas le choix.

    Massaker von Mỹ Lai"Ich fühle noch heute den Horror in mir"

    Die hier über diesen Link veröffentliche Fassung dieses Textes ist nicht identisch mit dem ausgestrahlten O-Ton, der in der Nacht ab 1:12 Uhr als HINTERGRUND ausgestrahlt wurde. Dort war ausdrücklich davon die Rede, dass die US-Amerikaner in der Armee nicht zu „Nazis“ hätten werden wollen - und es doch geworden sind.

    In dem auf der oben zitierten URL zur Verfügung gestellten Download sind diese Passagen ebenfalls nicht mehr zu hören:

    Es stellt sich heraus, dass der Beitrag einen Tag zuvor in einer anderen Fassung unter dem Titel: Vor 50 Jahren: Das Massaker von My Lai ausgestrahlt worden war.

    Darin wird dann auch ausdrücklich das Wort „Pinkville“ genannt

    #histoire #Vietnam #USA #guerre #théâtre #George_Tabori

  • Trump’s nuclear wake-up call - POLITICO
    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/donald-trump-nuclear-weapons-233822

    Confronting the reality of nuclear war has left past presidents deeply moved, even shaken. In his 1999 memoir, Bill Clinton’s former spokesman George Stephanopoulos described seeing Clinton emerge from his nuclear briefing, held at 7am on the morning of his inauguration.

    “The man who would soon command the most powerful military force in the world emerged… silent and more somber than I’d ever seen him,” Stephanopoulos wrote.

    Clinton wasn’t the only one moved. Stephanopoulos recalled that George H.W. Bush’s outgoing national security advisor, retired Gen. Brent Scowcroft, “slipped out of Blair House and into the street with tears reddening the rims of his eyes.”

    (...) Trump’s Friday briefing is meant to ensure that he understands how to quickly order a nuclear attack in the event of an emergency.

    “The briefer is very, very military. It’s a military briefing,” Card said. “It’s not a briefing of the conscience. It’s by-the-book, it’s rote.”

    “It’s kind of like how to use your remote control for the TV,” Card added.

    #nucléaire #bombe #États-Unis

  • Chuck Hagel, secrétaire à la Défense américain d’Obama de 2013 à 2015 critique vertement la politique suivie par la maison blanche en Syrie depuis le début - donc y compris durant les deux ans où il était en poste - dans un des salons de l’establishment US et de l’OTAN : l’Atlantic Council. Ses propos, derrière la critique d’une « rhétorique », sonnent en fait plutôt comme un réquisitoire contre les opérations de changement de régime :
    US’ Syria Policy ’Paralyzed’ by Rhetoric that Assad Must Go, Says Hagel
    http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/us-syria-policy-paralyzed-by-rhetoric-that-assad-must-go-says-hagel

    Former Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, thinks that the Obama administration has become “paralyzed” by its rhetoric that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad must step down, said budget cuts have pushed the United States “perilously close” to being unable to maintain its military dominance, equated the Republican presidential campaigns to an amateur talent contest, and had some advice for Donald Trump: “focus on uniting this country, not dividing it.”
    “We have allowed ourselves to get caught and paralyzed on our Syrian policy by the statement that ‘Assad must go,’” Hagel said at the Atlantic Council on January 13. “Assad was never our enemy. A brutal dictator? Yes.”
    But, he added, important lessons should have been learned from the ouster of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Moammar Gadhafi in Libya. Following Hussein’s execution in December of 2006, former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s divisive policies deepened the sectarian divide in the country and contributed to the emergence of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS). In Libya, the toppling of Gadhafi by rebels aided by a Western military campaign in 2011 plunged the country into a downward spiral of chaos from which it has yet to recover.
    “You can take a brutal dictator out, but you better understand what you may get in return,” Hagel said. “We never asked that question: What is coming after Assad?”
    Assad will eventually have to go, but “that should not hold us captive,” he added.
    While the United States and Saudi Arabia have taken the position Assad must go, Russia and Iran hold the opposite view. This has been a key sticking point to finding a solution to Syria’s war, which is now in its fifth year.
    It will take a collaborative effort involving the United States, Russia, Iran, and the Gulf Arab states to create a “platform of stability” in the Middle East, Hagel said.

    L’article rappelle de plus qu’il s’en était déjà pris, après son départ, dans une interview à Foreign Policy, aux choix faits par Obama sur les dossiers syrien et ukrainien, et qu’il s’est opposé à l’influence de Susan Rice (liberal interventionnist). Un élément supplémentaire, manifestement, à l’appui de la thèse de Hersh sur une fronde sourde des hommes de la défense Vs les courants influents à la Maison blanche et Obama jusqu’en 2014 :

    In an interview with Foreign Policy in December, Hagel was scathing in his criticism of the White House, which he accused of micromanaging the Pentagon and trying to “destroy” him. He also acknowledged serious policy differences with the White House on three main areas: Syria, Ukraine, and shutting down the military prison at Guantanamo Bay.
    Hagel reiterated some of that criticism in his remarks at the Atlantic Council.
    The former Defense Secretary, who has not refuted reports that he frequently clashed with National Security Advisor Susan Rice, accused the White House of micromanaging policy through the National Security Advisor and White House Chief of Staff. “Governing is not dominating. It is just the opposite,” Hagel said. “You need good people and you need to trust good people. If you don’t think they are good people and you don’t trust them you shouldn’t have asked them to come in to start with.”

  • EU seeks talks with Israel over ‘red lines’ in West Bank

    Israeli officials fear that proposed negotiations are prelude to further European sanctions.
    By Barak Ravid | Oct. 22, 2014
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.622099

    The European Union is interested in opening negotiations with Israel with the aim of preventing a series of Israeli moves in the West Bank deemed “red lines” which may jeopardize the possibility of a future Palestinian state alongside Israel, an internal EU document obtained by Haaretz reveals. Officials in the Israeli Foreign Ministry are concerned the negotiations are a prelude to further European sanctions against Israel.

    In recent weeks, since the Israeli appropriation of 4,000 dunams in Gush Etzion in the West Bank and even more since the push forward in planning for additional construction in Givat Hamatos, a neighborhood beyond the Green Line, a series of discussions have been taking place in the EU’s headquarters in Brussels between the ambassadors of the 28 members states over the European response.

    During these discussions, which ended last weekend, it was decided to relay a sharp message to Israel in the name of all EU members, focusing on the Israeli moves which create a “focused and increasing threat to the possibility of the two-state solution.”

    The EU’s ambassador to Israel, Lars Faaborg-Andersen, is set to relay the message to Israel. He is expected to meet in the coming days with Foreign Ministry Director Nissim Ben Sheetrit and with national security advisor in the Prime Minister’s Office Yossi Cohen to propose negotiations over the issues which raised the EU’s concerns.

    Haaretz obtained an internal EU document with instructions as to the content of the message Ambassador Faaborg-Andersen is supposed to relay to the ministry’s officials and to the Prime Minister’s Office.

    “The EU considers the preservation of the two state solution a priority,” the document reads. “The only way to resolve the conflict is through an agreement that ends the occupation which began in 1967, that ends all claims and fulfills the aspirations of both parties. A one state reality would not be compatible with these aspirations.”

    The two-page document defines several of the EU’s “red lines” regarding Israeli actions in the West Bank:

    1. Construction in the Givat Hamatos neighborhood, beyond the Green Line in Jerusalem: The document said that construction in that area would jeopardize the possibility of a contiguous Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as the capital of both states. The EU “cautions the Israeli government not to move ahead with tenders and construction. Such a development would constitute one more grave “fact on the ground” which would be liable to crucially prejudge the outcome of peace negotiations,” the document reads.

    2. Construction in the E1 area between Ma’aleh Adumim and Jerusalem: The document said construction in that area would also jeopardize the possibility of contiguous Palestinian state, and added that it has already publicly and strongly opposed plans for E1’s development.

    3. Further construction in the Har Homa neighborhood in Jerusalem, beyond the Green Line.

    4. Israeli plans to relocate 12,000 Bedouin without their consent in a new town in the Jordan Valley, expelling them from lands in the West Bank, including E1: “The EU strongly urges Israel to put these plans on hold and search for other solutions together with the concerned populations and the Palestinian Authority. The EU underlines that implementing those plans may amount to a serious breach of International Humanitarian Law (IV Geneva Convention),” the document reads.

    5. Harming the status-quo at the Temple Mount: The document said that attempts to challenge the status-quo have led to instability in East Jerusalem and increased tensions. A top European diplomat noted that EU states consuls in East Jerusalem and in Ramallah planned to hold a joint tour of Temple Mount, but aborted their plans following instructions from Brussels, fearing Israel would consider such a visit a provocation.

    According to the document, the EU ambassador in Israel was instructed to clarify to the Foreign Ministry director and to the national security advisor that the EU is interested in holding “thorough discussion” on these and other issues related to the occupied Palestinian territories. “…there is a legitimate expectation to have a constructive dialogue with the Israeli authorities on measures from their side which may impact on our assistance and its ultimate objectives of creating a sound enabling environment for economic and social development in the occupied Palestinian territories and contributing to create the conditions for a viable Palestinian state,” the documents reads.

    Red lines still vague

    Senior European diplomats noted that in the discussions in Brussels the European “red lines” in the West Bank to be posed to the Israelis during negotiations have yet to be fully defined, if at all, and what would the repercussions for crossing them would be.

    “Some countries, first of which is France, believe Israel must be presented with specific sanctions to be leveled if Israel takes specific actions so that there won’t be any surprises and the price is clear,” a senior European diplomat said.

    “However, this issue is still under discussion and no final decision has been made.”

    Israel’s Foreign Ministry has followed the EU preparations to up the tone against Israel for several weeks. In discussions held over the issue in the ministry on Tuesday the expectation was floated that the message relayed by the EU ambassador would be the opening shot ahead of new European sanctions against the Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

    “The negotiations the EU is offering are really the hearing before the sentence,” a senior official in the ministry said.

    “We have a feeling they’re expecting us to reject the offer for negotiations and give them an excuse to push the sanctions against us, or that we’ll agree in any case to negotiations in which we’ll discuss which sanctions will be leveled,” he added.

    EU ambassador Lars Faaborg-Andersen refused to comment.

    “““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
    L’UE établit une liste des “lignes rouges” à ne pas franchir par Israël
    http://www.i24news.tv/fr/actu/international/48200-141022-l-ue-liste-les-lignes-rouges-a-ne-pas-franchir-par-israel

    Certaines mesures prises par Israël constituent une « menace ciblée (…) à l’option d’une solution à deux Etats »

    L’Union européenne veut adresser un message clair à Israël pour empêcher que des « lignes rouges » ne soient franchies et mettent en péril la création d’un futur Etat palestinien, révèle un document européen interne cité par le quotidien Haaretz.

    Ces dernières semaines, plusieurs réunions ont eu lieu à Bruxelles sur la réponse européenne à adopter après l’approbation de constructions israéliennes à Givat Hamatos début octobre.

    Au terme de ces rencontres, l’UE a décidé de relayer un message fort à Israël, soulignant le fait que ce type de mesures constituent une « menace ciblée (…) à l’option d’une solution à deux Etats. »

    Dans le document consulté par Haaretz, l’UE établi une liste de points censés représenter la position européenne, relayée par l’ambassadeur européen en Israël Faaborg-Andersen lors de ses prochaines rencontres avec le directeur du Ministère des Affaires étrangères, Nissim Ben Shitrit et le conseiller à la sécurité nationale du Premier ministre, Yossi Cohen.

    La poursuite des constructions israéliennes à Jérusalem-est et en Cisjordanie figurent en tête de liste, ainsi que le relogement des Bédouins dans la vallée du Jourdain sans leur consentement. L’UE insiste également sur le maintien du statu-quo sur le Mont du temple pour éviter tout embrasement à Jérusalem-est.

    Un responsable israélien du Ministère des Affaires étrangères a critiqué la stratégie européenne qui selon lui, vise à trouver une excuse pour imposer des sanctions à Israël.

    « Nous avons le sentiment qu’ils attendent que nous rejetions leur offre de négociations afin de leur donner une excuse pour décider de sanctions contre nous », a-t-il confié à Haaretz.

  • Germany nixes gunboat subsidy to Israel, citing breakdown of peace talks - Haaretz
    By Barak Ravid | May 15, 2014
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.590996

    The German government has decided not to give Israel a massive subsidy for the purchase of German missile boats, due to the breakdown in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, both Israeli and German officials said on Thursday.

    For months now, Israel and Germany have been negotiating a deal under which Israel would purchase three or four German gunboats to protect its offshore gas fields in the Mediterranean Sea. The deal, first reported by Haaretz, was valued at about $1 billion before any discounts.

    However, Israel had asked Germany for the same 30 percent discount it received on an earlier purchase of German submarines – a benefit that would be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Berlin agreed to cover a third of the cost of the submarines as part of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s policy of bolstering Israel’s security.

    The German decision not to subsidize the gunboats was first reported Thursday morning by the Israeli website Maariv Hashavua. According to that report, the Germans sent a “secret letter” announcing the decision to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office on Independence Day (May 6). But Haaretz has learned that the news came not in a letter, but in a phone call from Merkel’s national security advisor, Christoph Heusgen, to his Israeli counterpart, Joseph Cohen.

    The conversation between Heusgen and Cohen was an extremely difficult one that quickly deteriorated into mutual recriminations. According to a senior Israeli official, Cohen accused the Germans of violating an explicit promise that Merkel made Netanyahu during a joint meeting of the German and Israeli cabinets in Jerusalem in February. Heusgen responded that Merkel never made any such promise.

    The Germans said they would be happy to sell Israel the gunboats, but only at full price. Heusgen explained to Cohen that given the breakdown of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, which has been blamed at least partly on Israeli settlement construction and that there is no chance the German parliament would approve subsidizing the gunboat deal.

    Senior Israeli officials said they believe the seeds of this decision were sown during Merkel’s White House meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama two weeks ago when he voiced great frustration over Netanyahu’s conduct during the eight months of Israeli-Palestinian talks.

    The gunboat issue also arose during U.S. National Security Advisor Susan Rice’s visit to Jerusalem last week. But Rice vehemently denied that Obama had asked Merkel to pressure Israel and said the two leaders never discussed the issue.

    Senior German officials said Merkel had taken note of Obama’s statements, but that these did not exert a decisive influence on her decision.

    • Berlin : pas de subvention pour sécuriser Israël
      Publié 16 Mai 2014
      http://www.i24news.tv/fr/actu/international/moyen-orient/140516-berlin-pas-de-subvention-pour-securiser-israel

      Le gouvernement allemand ne concèdera pas de subvention à Israël pour l’achat de croiseurs lance-missiles achetés à l’Allemagne, en raison de l’échec des pourparlers avec les Palestiniens, a rapporté jeudi le quotidien israélien Haaretz, citant des responsables des deux pays.

      Dans le cadre de l’’accord, négocié laborieusement pendant plusieurs mois, Israël devait se procurer trois ou quatre croiseurs destinés à sécuriser sa côte méditerranéenne et pariculièrement ses puits de gaz en mer, une vente qui s’élève à 1 milliard de dollars, sans la déduction.

      L’Allemagne a en effet refusé de couvrir les 30% de réduction demandés au cours du deal par l’Etat hébreu, au même titre qu’il avait bénéficié au passé de cette faveur lors d’une transaction de sous-marins allemands.

      Or cette subvention avait été couverte à l’époque par le gouvernement allemand, dans une volonté de renforcer la sécurité israélienne sous l’égide de la chancelière Angela Merkel, un avantage souhaité de nouveau par Israël dans l’achat des croiseurs.

      Le refus de Berlin de subventionner la vente des croiseurs lance-missiles, a été considéré par Israël comme une « violation » d’une promesse de Merkel à la Défense israélienne.